Find relevant support
Move from a broad concern to mental support, family resources or another appropriate category.
Exploring a mobile companion that helps people navigating oncology care find relevant resources, local support and a clear route to conversation.
The original project explored support for people navigating oncology care in Switzerland. Interview and workshop material pointed to fragmented information, difficulty finding relevant help and the effort of staying connected through treatment.
The screens focus on three patient-facing needs: understanding where to find support, discovering nearby offers and reaching a familiar care contact.
Move from a broad concern to mental support, family resources or another appropriate category.
Browse local groups and events in a selected region, with enough detail to decide what to do next.
Recognise a care contact in the inbox and continue a conversation alongside personal messages.
A concept developed through interviews, a stakeholder workshop, wireframes, interface design and usability testing. The available screens show support content, event discovery and messaging. They do not establish clinical appointment booking, medical-record access, deployment status or measured effects on care.
The early work explored several ways to enter the app. The later home screen names six areas of support and gives each a consistent place.
A radial entry point placed the patient at the centre, while an early content view grouped many options in a compact grid.
A category home makes the choices explicit: mental support, hospital, family and friends, sport and fitness, nutrition, and supporters and gadgets.
Design trade-off. Categories make the breadth of support easier to see, but the app still needs to help someone who arrives with a specific question and does not know which category contains the answer.
Family and friends combines experience stories, advice and regional resources.
Larger cards create a more deliberate reading path. Similar treatment appears in mental support.
The strongest screens show a path through content and a path to a human conversation. Together they give the concept a more concrete purpose than a general hub for all care.
The early list filters local offers by place. The later concept uses cards to show activities in the selected region. Both directions need clear organisers, dates and contact details before a patient can decide to participate.
The inbox mixes a marked care contact with personal conversations. A dedicated thread provides direct messaging; the role, visibility and expected response should remain clear inside the conversation.
Chat is present in the bottom navigation in both groups of mockups. The available screens show visual refinement, not evidence that the feature was moved to a new place.
The hospital section presents education events. A separate screen shows an action to add an event to an external calendar, helping the person keep track of something they chose to attend.
Scope of this flow. These screens support event discovery and calendar handoff. They do not show booking or rescheduling a clinical appointment.
The original case study describes user interviews, usability sessions and changes to colour, chat and onboarding. The supplied material shows several stages of design; it does not include the number of participants, task results or a measured before-and-after comparison.
Recorded feedback: participants asked for better visibility. The high-fidelity screens explore a softer palette, which still needs a direct check of text contrast, icon clarity and touch targets on a phone.
Recorded feedback: the case text says chat needed greater prominence. The supplied low- and high-fidelity screens both place chat in the bottom navigation. The next evaluation should test whether people identify the correct contact quickly.
Recorded feedback: participants requested guidance for new users. A later test should check whether someone can complete a first support task with clear labels and contextual help.
The project demonstrates discovery, workshop-led exploration, wireframes and a developed visual direction for a patient support companion. Its strongest opportunities are easier access to resources and clearer human contact.
The original project credits me with research and discovery, low- and high-fidelity design, and coded components. The visual material here documents the research-to-interface path; implementation details are not included in these screens.
Show the source and currency of support content, distinguish clinical and personal conversations, strengthen text and navigation clarity, and test the two primary patient tasks with documented outcomes.